James Cheetham: jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com. Powered by Blogger.
RSS

Awww...Young Love...

Like Crazy VS One Day

reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

Taking a change of pace from my usual horror movie fanfare, I took the opposite route last night and went down the dreaded romantic drama genre, and like a sucker for punishment, I made it a double bill. The two films of last nights candle lit date between me and my laptop being, Like Crazy and One Day.

And when viewing both back to back it drove home how pertinent it is for the film creators to craft a subtle realistic couple, and how sometimes it works and other times it utterly fails. The two films in question work as a nice double viewing; one is a perfect blend of movie magic where the script's dialogue, the director's swift control of the proceedings and the actor's ability and chemistry all come together...and the second, where none of it melds believably and instead results in an odd patchwork that leaves behind a hollow unemotional film.

I initially scoffed at the trailer for Like Crazy, making my usual assumption that it looked like a convoluted boring 'romantic' young love affair that would only cause a bout of depression. And although I'd like to stick to my negative prejudgements, I actually loved this film. With perfect casting with Felicity Jones and Anton Yelchin, the central couple who finds themselves torn between the worlds of London and LA and the inevitable issue of a green card, it makes for a touching and perfectly handled film.

The romance isn't forced and unlike the majority of romantic dramas or rom coms, the dialogue isn't shoe horned in and unrealistic, no out of the blue one liners to demonstrate how 'plucky' the central heroine is (I'm looking at you Meg Ryan.) It is something that One Day could have learned from.

While Like Crazy sometimes opts for moments of silence knowing the audience can work out what the characters are thinking due to the great direction and performances, One Day seems to feel the need to force romantic dialogue that sounds out of place. "I Love you Dexter, I just don't like you." (meh.)

One Day might have worked as a novel (by David Nicholls), as a film it is a bit of a sorry excuse, with terrible characterisation in parts, especially Dexter, played by Jim Sturgess, who is usually a great go to actor for the relatable central male lead. Instead, Dexter comes across as a complete pompous arse-twat, which in some parts of the narrative is needed, but the performance lacks the fundamental he may be a douche but deep down he is a nice guy approach. Instead you just think he is a total posho bastard. And it is here where the whole root of the film doesn't work, mainly due to Dexter being a total boob; the central friendship is wholly unbelievable and when it evolves into a relationship the characters suddenly have a personality transplant as if to make the relationship feel natural.

Neither film has a particularly upbeat finale, (thank god) and while One Day's tragedy is on a far bigger scale, the end of Like Crazy is far more devastating due to its subtly and poignant nature.

So if I could advise one droopy romantic film to watch this winter season, I wholeheartedly would scream Like Crazy while simultaneously spitting on One Day.

Like Crazy: 4/5

One Day: 2/5

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The Thing (2011)

The Thing (2011)

Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

Amid many outcrys of disgust and disgrace, the prequel/almost-remake/not-a-sequel to John Carpenter's The Thing, cleverly entitled just...The Thing...has finally squirmed onto the big screen, the big question being; is its existence completely pointless?

Surprisingly...no, and while disappointingly it doesn't take full advantage of such a venture, it still becomes a somewhat entertaining film that lazily attempts a spot of fan-service along the way.

The plot is relatively the same as the original and it hits each note that you'd expect, sometimes playing on our expectations but unfortunately not as often as one would hope. The climax manages to explore the mythology of The Thing more so than the original and while it is a nice attempt, bringing in a sudden surge of science fiction-y imagery seems to play against what made the original so entertaining and causes the finale to mutate into a rather cumbersome cgi heavy affair.

Speaking of, the charmingly vile goopy effects of the first are of course replaced with plenty of computer generated mutations that are convincing in places, but manage to completely unscare and oddly ungore what is sprouting out of the latest victim. The Thing is instead turned into more of a rampaging beast than the original, which takes away the unsettling slow regurgitating nature of John Carpenter's beast. You end up wondering why it bothers trying to imitate them at all and not just stampede through the place with its red danglys squirming proudly instead.

Failing to really get stuck into proceedings and instead opting to not offend fans by sticking closely to the original, The Thing evolves into yet another remake (John Carpenter's being a remake in itself) rather than a prequel. So while hardcore fans will scream out the blasphemous existence of this 'prequel', others may find a sometimes entertaining film that, while not as rip roaring as the original, still manages to pass the torch of the original onto another generation without destroying the memory of the first.

2/5

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Top 10 Soul-Crushing Films

Top 10 list created for Halloween...watch these films at the behest of your faith in humanity being forever quashed...

http://www.subtitledonline.com/special-features/top-10-soul-crushing-films-in-world-cinema

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS