James Cheetham: jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com. Powered by Blogger.
RSS

The Hangover 2 Review

The Hangover 2

Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com


Like any summer sequel, The Hangover 2 attempts to abide by the three rules of reaping high box office figures; bigger, better and flashier, and it manages to achieve all but the most vital. Unfortunately it is far from better.

Rather than making any effort to rejuvenate the narrative beats of the last film, The Hangover 2 simply devolves into the first film but set in Bangkok. The tiger is replaced with a drug running monkey and the baby is swapped for Mr Chow, Chow being the only plot device that manages to bring in some semblance of hilarity.

Instead of coming across as the light-hearted disaster-com of the first film, The Hangover 2 almost seems to try to approach the genre of dark comedy, minus the comedy. The hung-over patriots are now slugged through a ream of horrific situations involving one getting shot, the dismemberment of fingers and one drunkenly having sex with another man. Any moments that could have allowed for comedy are killed with unintelligent dialogue, one example being the scene that reveals to the horrified Stu that he had sex with a man, the humour being shot down mercilessly with distasteful writing; “I shoot my load into you and you shoot your load onto the floor.” Awkward silence. Any moments of enjoyable word play come from Mr Chow, “Hola! City of Squalor!” but these are few and far between.

Rather than develop what will no doubt become a sequel laden franchise into an unexpected comedy romp, The Hangover 2 makes no effort to switch things up and with it hitting the same beats as the last, the ridiculous surprises that made the first offering so enjoyable are now gone.

2/5

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Hereafter Review


Hereafter

Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

It’s always a good day in any film fan's week when a new Clint Eastwood film comes along, his most recent directorial effort being, Hereafter.

Unlike his previous endeavours, which focus upon political and emotional injustices and dramas, (i.e his other Matt Damon vehicle, Invictus) Hereafter is a different animal altogether, instead awkwardly attempting to juggle themes of the afterlife and psychic reverberations.

Charting three alternative narratives, and trying to merge the trio together, we are treated to one plot involving Damon and his unfocused and burdened psychic ability, a young boy who’s grieving the loss of his twin brother in London, and Cecile de France who narrowly escaped death due to a tragic tsunami.

These three plots are loosely connected, each one shuffling along at a fairly slow rate, and when they do finally conjoin it is so late in the game that there is no satisfying pay off.

Unfortunately, this means Hereafter bumbles along at a badly structured and uninteresting pace, the only memorable moment being the CGI laden tsunami sequence which acts as the exciting and promising opener of the film, the only other draw of the rest of the run-time being Damon's portrayal of a damaged psychic, doing his best with a fairly shoddy and somewhat embarrassing script. ("It's not a blessing...it's a curse!" *audience rolls eyes*)

Instead of exploring the mysterious depths of the myths of the afterlife, Hereafter comes across just as bland as its depictions of the ghost's limbo dimension; boring and lifeless.

We shall allow you this one bump in the road Clint, but please don't plan on making another...

2/5

Hereafter is released on DVD 13th June

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Horror; Let Me In & Wakewood Reviews 2/5/11.

Let Me In


Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

It’s hard to review a remake of an already brilliant and recent film. It means the original is still relatively fresh in your mind with its first viewing and in most cases the remake will pale in comparison. Let Me In is a perfect example of this.

Unlike many remakes, Let Me In is not a bad film, far from it. But its existence is fairly pointless (much like other recent remakes such as Quarantine, the unneeded remake of Rec), with characters and themes all being tackled in the same way as the original and not really attempting anything radically different. The only two differences that crop up are the obvious language differences and the acting.

Let Me In lacks the atmosphere of the original with the melodrama being more evident in the remake and over fraught, something that eats away at the mysteriously sinister nature of the characters/relationships. The lead actors are not bad in any sense, but appear average when compared with the otherworldliness of the leads from Let The Right One In. They simply do not have the same chemistry or depth.

If viewed alone, Let Me In would have been a great film, but with the Swedish version having beaten the Hollywood edition to the punch, this film comes across as lacking and merely rolls along, always slightly missing out on the magic of Let The Right One In.

3/5


WakeWood

Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

Hammer horror, in an attempt to break back into the world of modern terror and pushing aside the torture-porn and remake purgatory of Hollywood is back, lambasting us with its usual fare of British eeriness.

Pulling strings from classics such as The Wicker Man and Don’t Look Now, Wakewood toils with a married couple who recently lost their daughter and move to the British countryside village of Wakewood.

As events progress and the mystical underbelly of Wakewood is revealed, our appetite for the sinister is fed and things evolve to involve sacrificial rituals, resurrection, creepy villages and plenty of bloody murder.

Whether director David Keating has made the effort to direct Wakewood to give it a slight hammer horror amateurish atmosphere, or simply lacks the talent is not 100% clear as the direction is sometimes uneven and doesn’t manage to achieve a balanced style throughout. However, the use of abrupt zoom-ins add to the classic horror feel and the plot weaves along in similar clichĂ©d aplomb.

Wakewood makes for a vaguely entertaining yarn, but the lack of originality is hard to overlook even with the rather entertaining finale.

2/5





  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Somewhere Review

Somewhere

Reviewed by James Cheetham

Jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

As an avid fan of Lost in Translation, I knew I was going to love this film. And while I can’t quite decide whether Somewhere topped it, I know that I definitely developed a deep fascination with it.

Sofia Coppola’s latest is rife in a quiet brilliant beauty that instils every single frame with a certain elegance. Whether this is an elegance of innocence, hope, self-destruction or sleaze, it spills from the screens as the camera slowly crawls through the life of fictional A-list celebrity Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff) and his 11 year-old visiting daughter (Elle Fanning).

The two central performances are tone perfect. Dorff creates a living crack that allows you to peak into the downside of a hedonistic-led life, and Elle Fanning juxtaposes his performance with a shy confidence that hides a pre-pubescent tirade of emotions and hormones soon to come.

Coppola sticks to what she knows and doesn’t try to develop a different style just for the sake of it. Somewhere has the same meandering essence that Lost in Translation was soaked in, but it works for the development of the characters and the slow moving plot, resulting in a strong sense of alignment between the characters and the viewer . This is put to good use within the moments of drama, and while not frequent, when they happen they become wonderfully intimate and hypnotic moments that showcase the talents of Coppola.

If you like your films slow-moving yet immensely satisfying, Somewhere is a must-see. An accomplished piece of cinema that calls for further viewings and satiates a hunger within cinephiles such as myself who will find themselves calling for further Sofia Coppola films to be brought into creation.

5/5

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The Adjustment Bureau Review

The Adjustment Bureau Review


Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

To be perfectly honest, I’ve had enough of Matt Damon and his damn running. The Bourne films were awesome, mainly because he interspersed his running with the odd face jab or kick, but it seems to becoming more prevalent that Damon is basing his roles on the amounting of running within the script.

His most recent role finds him chasing a lost love, a girl he should have ended up with, but due to various fantastical reasons, his destiny with her was dodged, changed, and warped, (so he’d become the president of the United States. Obviously.)

With this relationship as the foundation of the narrative, The Adjustment Bureau becomes a romance film wrapped loosely within the trimmings of scifi/fantasy. Fantasy you ask? Yes, because the main plot device of the film is the use of angel-like creatures. They are men in suits who mince around in bowler hats with little notepads that reveal the life maps of people, life maps that they must ensure are followed.

These bowler-hat men meddle in the everyday lives of humans to make sure we all reach our ultimate goals and generally just walk around using free will to wipe their ass. Why? Because last time they let us live by free will we invented genocide. Go us.

So they are involving themselves in our mess to make sure the human species eventually climbs towards its finale.

Matt Damon’s character sidesteps his controlled fate when he meets a ballerina played by the marvellous Emily Blunt. The chemistry between the two is brilliant and makes his constant pursuit of her believable. But with his fawning after her meaning he is not reaching his written destiny the angels become involved, attempting to break the two up. The excitement of the film doesn't really kick in until the end when there is a chase scene and a whole lot of jargon is spilled out into the film, which ultimately just leads to Damon running around a lot. Again. And after all the running? A boring deux ex machina that will have most eyes rolling in annoyance.

So prior to the final triathlon, The Adjustment Bureau is simply rather a lot of romantic yearning and composition driven dialogue via suited men. Overall? Not nearly entertaining enough and it falls into the frequent trap of; seen the trailer? seen the film.

2/5

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Update; 26/4/11.

With a schedule of full-time work and busy weekends, my attention to my writing has dropped significantly. So in a bid to motivate myself back into writing, I've decided to try and keep up a steady flow of film reviews by shortening them and making them snappier.


I'm also not limiting myself to just reviews for other websites and will be writing short reviews of films I catch through-out the week and posting them on here. Again, they won't be the 700 + wordy reviews I usually do, simply because I do not have the time to manage that these days.

So hopefully the shorter reviews won't be a complete literary wreck and may also be easier for readers who just want to scan over a film review rather than read a 1000 + word review...(black swan review. *cough* *cough*)

Cheers guys!

-James

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

You Will Meet A Tall Dark Stranger Review


written for www.devildeeds.com

Reviewed by James Cheetham
jamescheetham.jcc@gmail.com

Being a Woody Allen film about love, life and relationships, You Will Meet A Tall Dark Strangerbegins just as you'd expect; with the black and white opening title credits, the jaunty music, and the inevitable narrator. After dire offerings such asCassandra's Dream, it is an opening that will put you in the mindset that this is Allen back to doing what he does best. Despite the fact that you may have an inclination of how the narrative will unfurl and the type of dilemmas the characters will encounter, you can't help but find yourself with that content smile plastered across your face in anticipation for the following Woody Allen frivolities.

Like past successes such as Hannah and Her Sisters and Vicky Christina Barcelona, You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger, handpicks a few characters, highlights their love life and zooms in on the day to day catastrophes that unwind amongst family members, careers and everyday home life.

Firstly we have the married couple of Alfie (Anthony Hopkins) and Helena (Gemma Jones), whose marriage is breaking down due to Alfie's mid-life crisis and his need to return to his younger fitter days. Their daughter, Sally (Naomi Watts), is also having marital issues with her hubby, Roy (Josh Brolin), a struggling writer who is putting off the idea of having kids and instead finds himself transfixed with the beauty in the red dress, Dia (Freida Pinto), who resides in the opposite building block.

As the narrative continues, further spanners in the works are introduced, mainly in the form of Sally's seductive art gallery boss, Greg (Antonia Banderas) and Alfie's new and much younger fiancé, Charmaine (Lucy Punch).

As the characters bump into each other and interact, the relationships twist and turn into an inevitable conclusion of disaster but Allen imbues this with his token dark humour that makes you laugh and cringe. You feel sympathy for the characters as things fall apart, but in equal measure feel as if they deserve all the mess they find themselves in due to their rather selfish wishes. We all want that perfect lifestyle of career and lover, and the reality is that not everyone will achieve that dream job while continuing a passionate and committed relationship.

The acting is passable, nothing particularly stand-out, other than the hilariously over-the-top performance from Lucy Punch, who drains as much comedy-gold chavness from Charmaine as possible. Naomi Watts is far from bad, but she does suffer from the problem of the occasional wooden line-delivery due to her faux British accent, an affliction seen with other actresses such as Natalie Portman in V for Vendetta.

Being no exception from many other Woody Allen films, ...Dark Stranger makes the setting of the film as much of the character as the people. Returning to the city of London after exploring it in other films such as Match Point, we are given a rather warm looking England with hues of orange, a colour sometimes out of place from the usual greys used to depict the city. But while ...Dark Stranger is less of a love-note to the city as seen in his love for New York in Manhattan or Annie Hall, it is nice to see London presented as a vibrant place, unlike the boiling pot of crime and hoodlums as it is usually seen as.

You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger concludes in the usual Woody Allen open-ended nature. Nothing is truly solved and the only character who is left somewhat content is that of Sally's mother Helena, the woman who gives the film its title in the first place due to her frequent visits to a psychic. Helena may be the furthest from a real sense of reality as she embroils herself in the worlds of fortune-telling and mysticism, but she ends up the happiest.

So maybe that's the moral of Woody Allen's tale; don't bog yourself down with the inevitable acceptance of reality and instead find a level of contentment in your own ridiculous illusions.

3/5

http://www.devilsdeeds.com/filmsreviewcomment.html

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS